Comments on: Zombie Attack! Second Wave

By: Vasili

Vasili — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 20:42:01 +0000

I personally love the Zombie Attack games! I play them all the time. But the towers do increase their power exponentially, the upgrade causes the tower to do MUCH more damage and shoot at a higher rate of speed. This review review is awful. You never even mentioned how diverse the levels are and how strategies can be set up. Nevertheless, you neglected to mention how the towers work.

The opinion you gave is completely flawed, especially when you stated that games should have a purpose, a level that is eventually reached to proclaim that you won. That's just fail.

Each turret has its own plus/minus. It's not as simple as Fieldrunners (love that game as well) since each tower doesn't have an established budget. No two towers are the same as well. I don't like how you are so simple minded that you don't even understand why zombie's health increase as well as level 4-6 upgrades. It's because when you kill a level 50 zombie, you get 50$. If you still only had to pay 250 dollars to upgrade a level 4 turret, then full upgrades on all turrets would be too easy to achieve. Think, “At level 10, I have 4 turrets all at the third upgrade, I need 25 kills to get a level 4 upgrade.” Later on, you think ” At level 50, I have 8 turrets all at level 3-6. An upgrade costs almost 1500$. I need 30 kills to get a level 4 turret.” See? The challenge increases.

I give this game a 4.6 out of 5. The gameplay is a ton of fun. It doesn't achieve the perfect because the machete upgrades are a little flawed. Also, I do agree that zombies MAY have a little too much health after around level 55. Money flow starts to slow down too much, which is frustrating. Plus the headless cheerleader's throw is lethal at around 30. Totally worth the money. Go for it and ignore this fool.

OH, and in response to your response to the previous poster, you provided no description. Especially since you claimed that there were 6 turrets when there are really 7. Did you even play the game or did your friend just give his opinion to you? My review may have opinions, but at least it provided actual info instead of inaccurate info and a rant.

Goodbye!

By: 148Apps

148Apps — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:02:09 +0000

Point 1 – reviews = opinion. Reviews that are not opinionated are not reviews but news.

Point 2 – this game did not get a bad review, got about a C.

Point 3 – why can you be opinionated in your comment and we can't be so in our reviews?

And finally, why can't you use your real name or email address?

/Jeff

By: YourAudience

YourAudience — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:50:21 +0000

This review is evidence of why your opinions are second tier. You have poor opinions, and anyone who has played the games you panned can instantly judge your failure as an unbiased critic. You have given poor, trashy, weak games high reviews, which further undermines your credibility. Please spend more time with a game before you criticize it so heavily.

You are constantly losing relevance in the gaming review world to sites like TouchArcade and SlideToPlay.

Try not using the first person as much. This isn't as much about your childish opinion as it is people looking for a REVIEW, not an OPINION. Just because you can't figure out how to play the game, doesn't mean countless others won't be able to.